Brakeup Union, are source of similar degrees of stressed

Brakeup is a major
risk Factor in predicting future delinquency, it is consociate with negative
results such as aforementioned, repetitive family transitions can result in
accumulatation of stress factors. According to Fomby and Cherlin (2007)
Parental brakeup affect the socio emotional development of the children further
the research can be deducted to a certain whether all family transitions,
associated with the formation or Parental brakeup Union, are source of similar
degrees of stressed for the children when compared to another. In addition to
Kierkus and Baer (2003) Broken Family consist of biological Family that has
seperated for specific reasons that may result in single parent. And most of
the time boys are more affected in having separated parent. In the study of
statistics of canada (2005) Broken Family show that children is most affected
in this case, they get more depression and have greater amount of being not
friendly to others and this eill become an important social issue. According to
the observations of haapasalo and Moilanen (2004) the child maltreatment should
predict adult criminal behaviour in young inmates, using both self report and
authorised data sources. After they discovered about childhood physical,
psychological and emotional abuse and disregard were resealing the behaviour
predictors criminality Kim (2011) Base on her statement that being broken
family it has contribute to an increasein internalize behavior. She also state
that it had little or no direct effect in behavioural problem. Although the
majority of children on broken family they didn’t experience clinical problem.
The negative effect of being separate to their parents are real for another
children. Shel also observe the parental brake up have an opposite effect on
children. Burton (2012) confirm that when the young children saw
misunderstanding between their parents sooner or later it can cause depression
and anxiety during their teenage years. Wadswort (2000) acknowledge that the
effect of parents undergo their children. Not only he verify the hypothesis
that the parents job affect their skills to handle their children, but his work
are also showed that the parents negative feelings about work affect children
educational aspirations, how they perform in school and their feelings of self
efficiency and attachments. All the conclusion are characteristic that have
been compliment with a increased risk of delinquency. Therefore conclude that
being in broken family have a negative effect to the children who experience
this case. Some of them experience how to abuse or maltreated by other person.
Children was depressed because of what happened to their family and some of
them was turn to a violent person that makes their life miserable. Base on our
research some children was feeling alone because their parents was not give
them more attention and Time. The relationship between family structure
delinquency and found that family process and economic factors play more
significant role than family type. It was assesed when the children were items
related to communication, support and conflict management in the family. In the
study of Desroisers and Simard (2010) a reduce version of the family work scale
used in the Ontario Child Health Study (OHCS) and the NLSCY. Based on the
response obtain, scores were calculated ranging from 0 to 10. Symptoms and
depression in mother was based on six questions drawn from the center for
Epimediologic studies depression. Accordingly to the study of Bhuiya and Chowdhury
(1997) the impact of divorce on survival of children during their childhood was
examine using deeper analysis. The set odd of health among children of being
having a broken family in their childhood was respectively 3.2 and 1.4 times
higher than the complete family. Hadi (2000) confirm that the prevalence and
determinants of child abuse from the year 1995 sample survey 4,643 children
who’s have age 10-15 in 150 villages. The investigation discover that 21% of
the children on labor force. While the Bangladesh Villages is rating as 2.3% of
all children were physically abused. 2% were financially exploited, 17% were
involuntary affect In applicable activities and also 3% were force to work for
long hours. The frequence of physical violation abundance higher through older
children, Boys was more liable than to Girls abuse to any kind. Juby (2005)
based on his examination the proportion of children living in a single parent
was increase that’s why many children don’t have a complete family because most
of their family was seperated when they are only a baby before they born. Mack
(2007) also studies the family type and the relationship between family
structure and delinquency is not all about broken family because the argument
support that family is not leading to a cause of delinquency. According to
Bradley and Corwyn (2002) they captured the individual impact to the children
adjustments when it’s happen. They found that there are 2 groups in terms of
household incomes, the child or separated or divorced parents. Mothers in
broken homes are affected it shows that by some symptoms like depression and
low level of static faction. Sun (2002) state that the parental involvement and
education improve of being violent lifestyle between family risk and involvement
of being harmful to other people. They knew that in a family did not have
important effect on the body’s. More specially the family was suffer only after
the children was involved In bad personality behavior. However Adam, M,S
Robertson, CT Gray Ray and Ray MC (2003) Observe that in family structure
family are not playing the highest role in being failure. It maybe helpful
because of many different theories can applied to youth crime and most better
to explain this issue. Moon (2011) implies that base on gender ,parents,
marital or divorce It can cause impact and affects their children particularly
in married father’s and mothers consider the of this in their children. The
examination exist with social psychological literature, everyone need to
consolidate their cognitive dissonance is intensive to the divorce literature.
Gottfredson and Hirsch (1990) admits that the case for single mothers is they
shall not have the time to discipline them. Many single parent are required to
work for long hours and thus admit their children to do a lot more without any
interference. They are also not inescapably notice of their children
misbehavior when truancy is realized by other. Therefore I conclude that broken
family is a case that received negative labels are more likely to be involved
in delinquent behavior. Parental breakup likely contribute to an increase
internalize behavior such as sadness and it have direct effect in behavioral
problems. Parental breakup constitute a high risk factor to certain problems as
source of stress. The negative effects of parental breakup are quite real for
those children.